Tingkat Kepuasan Pengunjung pada Daya Tarik Ekowisata dan Edukasi Green Talao Park di Kabupaten Padang Pariaman
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This research was motivated by problems regarding visitor dissartisfaction with existing attractions, inadewuate acces, unavailability of souvenir and souvenir sellers, lack of health facilities and inadequate maintenance of available facilities.This type of research is classified into quantitative descriptive with a causal associative approach. The sampling technique used in this study is a non-probability sampling technique with purposive sampling. The number of samples used amounted to 379 people. The data collection technique was carried out by distributing questionnaires using a Likert scale that has been tested for validity and reliability. Data processing was carried out using the continuum line method. Based on the research conducted, the following results were obtained: The level of satisfaction in terms of the attraction indicator with an average acquisition of 2.43 in the dissatisfied category, The level of satisfaction in terms of accessibility indicators with an average acquisition of 2.42 in the unsatisfied category satisfied, the satisfaction level in terms of facility indicators with an average acquisition of 2.21 with the dissatisfied category, and the satisfaction level in terms of supporting service indicators with an average acquisition of 2.43 with the dissatisfied category
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Saing Taman Wisata Alam Kawah Ijen Banyuwangi ),” vol. 10, no. September, 2012.
[2] Liantika Rindani, Kepuasan Wisatawan Tentang Daya Tarik Wisata Pantai Air Manis Padang,
vol. 152, no. 3. Skripsi UNP. Padang, 2016.
[3] I. D. Afianto and H. N. Utami, “Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Dan Komunkasi Organisasi Terhadap
Kepuasan Kerja Dan Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada Karyawan Divisi Marketing PT. Victory
International Futures Kota Malang),” J. Adm. Bisnis S1 Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 50, no. 6, pp.
58–67, 2017.
[4] R. Somad and D. J. Priansa, Manajemen Supervisi dan Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. 2014.
[5] E. Mulyadi and N. Fitriani, “Konservasi Hutan Mangrove Sebagai Ekowisata,” J. Ilm. Tek.
Lingkung., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2014.
113
[6] I. B. & G. B. R. U. Kade Subhiksu, Daya Tarik Wisata Museum Sejarah dan
Perkembangannya di Ubud Bali. Yogyakarta: CV. Budi Utama, 2018.
[7] D. Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kuatintatif , kualitatif dan R & D / Sugiyono. 2018.
[8] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D.
Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.
[9] S. Abdulhaji, I. Sina, and H. Yusuf, “Pengaruh Atraksi, Aksesibilitas, dan Fasilitas Terhadap
Citra Objek Wisata Danau Tolire Besar di Kota Ternate,” J. Penelit. Hum., vol. 7, pp. 134–
147, 2016.
[10] G. Suwantoro, “Dasar-Dasar Pariwisata,” in 1, Cet, 3. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2004.
[11] U. I. Gusti, Pemasaran Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2017.
[12] & E. P. Setyanto, I., “Pengaruh Komponen Destinasi Wisata (4A) Terhadap Kepuasan
Pengunjung Pantai Gemah Tulungagung,” J. Adm. Bisnis, vol. Vol.7 No.2, no. 1, pp. 157–167,
2019.
[13] D. Helln Angga, “Pengembangan Obyek Dan Daya Tarik Wisata Alam Sebagai Daerah Tujuan
Wisata Di Kabupaten Karanganyar,” J. Sosiol. DILEMA, vol. 32, pp. 34–44, 2017